13 results for 'cat:"Consumer Law" AND cat:"Class Action" AND cat:"False Advertising"'.
J. Reyes tosses a third-amended false advertising complaint concerning at-home ovulation test kits sold at various nationwide retail chains under the Clearblue and First Response brands. The suing customers say the products fail to predict when a consumer is ovulating with 99% accuracy. The court finds a reasonable consumer would exhibit a higher degree of discernment when deciding whether to buy the product and would read the side and back labeling, which clearly state the product does not test for actual ovulation, rather it detects a rise in luteinizing hormone levels, which typically suggests ovulation will occur in the next 24-36 hours.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Reyes, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv5435, NOS: Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: consumer Law, class Action, false Advertising
J. Gilliam dismisses false advertising claims against Dole from consumers who say the company misrepresents their line of fruit and drink products as being healthy and nutritious, when in fact many of the products derive most of their calories from sugar. The consumers challenge phrases on the packaging such as, "We promise to provide everyone, everywhere with good nutrition," but these phrases are surrounded by analogies and playful drawings. They are "vague and aspirational" statements that are common in exaggerated advertising, leaving no room for claims based on them to survive.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Gilliam, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv3320, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: consumer Law, class Action, false Advertising
J. Robart declines to dismiss the Washington Consumer Protection Act claim in the timeshare owners' class action alleging that Happy Hour Media Group did not truly assist them in "exiting" their timeshare obligations in various resort properties. False advertising can be an unfair or deceptive practice under the WCPA, and the timeshare owners sufficiently allege that Happy Hour knowingly provided false information when promoting Reed Hein & Associates, because Happy Hour “drafted advertising and marketing content used by” Reed Hein and Lampo Group.
Court: USDC Western District of Washington, Judge: Robart, Filed On: February 23, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv630, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: consumer Law, class Action, false Advertising
J. Martinez-Olguin allows some class claims to continue against Simpson Imports from consumers who say the company sells canned tomatoes that are labeled as being higher-end San Marzano tomatoes, when they are actually standard tomatoes. The products are sold with "SMT" on the label that the company claims stands for San Merican tomato, and while that interpretation may hold up later in court, at this early stage it is plausible that consumers are being duped into believing that the label is referring to the more expensive San Marzano.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Martinez-Olguin, Filed On: February 20, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv2214, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: consumer Law, class Action, false Advertising
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Hurd dismisses a putative class action consumer fraud and false advertising lawsuit against Tom’s of Maine, finding the claims fail to allege a reasonable consumer would be led to believe, based on its packaging, that its antiplaque and whitening toothpaste product helps prevent periodontal diseases like gingivitis.
Court: USDC Northern District of New York, Judge: Hurd, Filed On: December 8, 2023, Case #: 6:23cv110, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: consumer Law, class Action, false Advertising
J. Morrison preserves class action false advertising claims against the makers of Nordic Naturals-brand vitamins and supplements that allege the product’s brand name, displayed prominently on the products’ packaging, misleads consumers into believing they contain natural ingredients when a substantial number of ingredients are synthetic. The court finds that the use of the name “naturals” could be deceiving to a reasonable consumer.
Court: USDC Eastern District of New York, Judge: Morrison, Filed On: September 28, 2023, Case #: 1:22cv3195, NOS: Truth in Lending - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: consumer Law, class Action, false Advertising
J. Gilliam Jr. allows some false advertising claims to continue against L'Oreal over allegations that the company sells cosmetics products that appear to provide sunscreen protection for 24 hours, when they only last for two. There is a label on the products that tells consumers to reapply the product every two hours, but it's printed under a peel-back sticker that may not be immediately visible to a purchasing consumer. It's plausible that this could dupe a typical buyer.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Gilliam Jr. , Filed On: July 17, 2023, Case #: 4:22cv7609, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: consumer Law, class Action, false Advertising
J. Orrick declines to dismiss class claims against Saraya USA from consumers who say the company misrepresents their granola products as being mostly sweetened by monk fruit. Consumers say the products are instead mostly sweetened by erythritol, a sugar alcohol. Given that the packaging for the products also contains phrases like "sugar free" or "no sugar added," it's reasonable at this stage to infer that buyers are being misled.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Orrick, Filed On: June 5, 2023, Case #: 3:22cv5232, NOS: Other Fraud - Torts - Personal Property, Categories: consumer Law, class Action, false Advertising